News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GNU Nano 4.0 by OJFord on Sunday March 24, 2019 @12:13PM (#19477079)
Many would say the old behaviour was the sane choice - apart from anything else it's consistent with vi(m) and git.
Re:GNU Nano 4.0 by tyingq on Sunday March 24, 2019 @12:31PM (#19477183)
I suppose. Though you might expect a GNU editor to follow Emacs for this behavior.