News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by assblaster on Saturday March 23, 2019 @08:23PM (#19473154)
I use YouTube Red, no ads, ever. And you get access to the entire Google music library.

Can't beat it for $7.99/month.

Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by biglenny on Saturday March 23, 2019 @08:31PM (#19473212)
I use uBlock Origin. No ads, ever. And you get access to all the music uploaded to YouTube.

$0.00/month

Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by userbinator on Saturday March 23, 2019 @10:04PM (#19473668)
For many years I've used a few shell scripts to turn YouTube into a "radio" of sorts, basically going through search results for a specific term (usually a music genre) and playing each one. It works pretty well, and the only ad-like experience is when it decides to play something not-really-related-nor-actually-music that just showed up in the results, but IMHO the "what was that?" aspect is part of the fun.

I'm clearly not the only one who came up with such an idea:

https://github.com/mps-youtube/mps-youtube

Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by gtirloni on Saturday March 23, 2019 @08:53PM (#19473326)
It makes me sad your comment is being downvoted. If people aren't happy with ads, they aren't happy paying for anything, then what's the alternative? I don't see any. Those people need to get paid for their work somehow.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by zuppy on Sunday March 24, 2019 @01:34AM (#19474584)
...or he got downvoted because it’s a solution that doesn’t work for all (I haven’t downvoted). I tried to subscribe to premium, but there’s no such option for me. It’s not available in my country.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by msla on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:45PM (#19473589)
It's getting downvoted because paid options grow ads, like most cable channels did. (Not all of them. I think TCM is still ad-free.)

Plus, a comment sibling to this one said YouTube Red has ads, so there's that.

Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by gtirloni on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:56PM (#19473635)
What does grow ads mean? FUD?

YouTube Premium is ad-free, it says so in their frontpage. Are you saying that's a blatant lie?

That doesn't address my point that content producers should get paid.

From YouTube Premium ad: "Ad-free YouTube, and our new music streaming service, YouTube Music. Services: No ads, Downloads, Background play."

Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by spudlyo on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:44PM (#19473583)
It's YouTube Premium now, and it's $11.99/month. Also, without resorting to APK hacks I don't think it's possible to use on my Amazon Fire Stick. Otherwise I'd love to pay for YouTube to watch YouTube without advertisements.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by PKop on Saturday March 23, 2019 @11:04PM (#19473946)
On Fire TV you can use the web version of Youtube in the browser (Silk or Firefox) and it works pretty well as it's formatted for the larger screen. I'm not sure if this doesn't apply to Fire Stick.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by spudlyo on Sunday March 24, 2019 @12:17AM (#19474281)
Ah, for some reason I just assumed that YouTube Premium didn't work with Firefox, which is what I use now, and you had to have the native Android App. I think the problem I had the last time I tried this had to do with the fact that I had a YouTube creator account, and Red wouldn't work with it.

Anyway, now I'm putting my money where my mouth is and am happily watching ad free YouTube content (which I love dearly) on my TV. Totally worth it.

Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by PKop on Monday March 25, 2019 @05:31PM (#19486919)
Don't forget about Google Music as well. Overall a pretty solid subscription package.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by matz1 on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:15PM (#19473436)
I have red, still plenty of ads.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by totoglazer on Saturday March 23, 2019 @10:42PM (#19473847)
What? I’ve had YouTube premium for well over a year and literally never seen an ad that wasn’t part of the actual video I was watching, added by the creator.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by matz1 on Saturday March 23, 2019 @11:21PM (#19474025)
Ad thats part of the actual video is an ad too.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by teddyfrozevelt on Saturday March 23, 2019 @11:42PM (#19474130)
That obviously doesn’t count, as there really isn’t anything YouTube can do about that.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by anticensor on Sunday March 24, 2019 @01:53AM (#19474663)
Google could respond by forcing them into an AdWords-like program and making embedded ads unskippable.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by matz1 on Sunday March 24, 2019 @08:46AM (#19476027)
That absolutely count. Youtube can ban this kind of video.
Re:Streaming video has surpassed cable subscriptions worldwide by spudlyo on Sunday March 24, 2019 @12:21AM (#19474290)
... which you can pretty easily fast forward through.