Oracle Swings the Layoff Axe

Re:Oracle Swings the Layoff Axe by johan_larson on Saturday March 23, 2019 @04:42AM (#19469620)

At Google, hires had to be approved by the founders as of 2013. This was when the company was hiring a few hundred people per week, so the founders got a spreadsheet with links or something like that. And apparently they did sometimes say no to some people.

It seems like a bonkers practice to me. I understand that it is important to hire good people. But this could be delegated several levels down, at least for entry-level hires. I suppose the top dogs could worry about promotions and hirings starting at the level of the junior managers, if they wanted to.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oracle Swings the Layoff Axe by shalmanese on Saturday March 23, 2019 @09:20AM (#19470329)

For the longest time, APMs had to have a phone screen with Marissa Mayer before they got hired. My main question when she asked me if I had any questions was whether this was the best use of her time. I don't know if that had any influence or not over their decision.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oracle Swings the Layoff Axe by jtreminio on Saturday March 23, 2019 @02:36PM (#19471701)

Don't leave us hanging - did it have a negative or positive effect on the outcome?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Oracle Swings the Layoff Axe by shalmanese on Sunday March 24, 2019 @01:50AM (#19474650)

Candidates aren't told why they were accepted/rejected from a job.

[ Parent | on HN ]