News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by Bahamut on Friday March 22, 2019 @11:34AM (#19463552)
All these things are important, but this misses the important distinction - the higher up the leadership chain is about the scale you operate at, whether you affect one team of developers, a couple of teams, a director level organization, executive level organization, or the whole company.
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by jessfraz on Friday March 22, 2019 @11:40AM (#19463597)
Ah so influence :)
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by adamdennis on Friday March 22, 2019 @11:48AM (#19463688)
At Salesforce, one of the ways we measured influence was by the amount of internal social network activity an individual accumulated... posts, likes, replies, etc. In nearly all cases, the higher ups had the most influence.
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by gcb0 on Friday March 22, 2019 @12:59PM (#19464439)
everything you make an input of the recognition process become an output of the office politics hack. obviously it corelates. at my company, were its not part of recognition, higher ups have zero posts on the information sharing systems.
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by jessfraz on Friday March 22, 2019 @11:40AM (#19463600)
Hard to define, do you have ideas :)
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by leothekim on Friday March 22, 2019 @12:01PM (#19463821)
The most succinct thing I've come up with is: "You're an influential engineer if an engineer magically becomes better just by sitting next to you."
Re:Defining a Distinguished Engineer by dougwbrunton on Friday March 22, 2019 @11:49AM (#19463695)
In my experience influence is earned using much of what you outline. Lovely blog post.