I think you are referring to the statement
> The Purdue researchers were able to recover up to 95 percent of the oil that was absorbed.
This is not referring to the amount of contaminants removed from the water. Its referring to recovering the oil from the activated carbon filter.
As to your second argument, the EPA's literal purpose is to force citizens to operate their life/business responsibly; if you think their standards are too lenient than take it up with your elected representative. One of my biggest frustrations I see here are people pushing to overthrowing everything for grand new systems, completely ignore the implementation details for such a system, and then get frustrated when the system fails because of the details. The system to accomplish your goals is already fucking there, use it.
One of my biggest frustrations I see here are people suggesting that you take things up with your representatives as if big corporations don't control the government.