News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High Court ruling implies headlines are copyright by chc on Saturday November 27, 2010 @07:18PM (#1946246)
As somebody in the newspaper business, I think it's very unreasonable. Editors also put a lot of effort into choosing good font faces, weights and sizes, but you're insane if you think you own the copyright on mixing 11.3 pt Minion Pro-Demi with 12 pt Balboa-Bold. The fact of the matter is, it may in fact be an excellent and highly creative look, but it's still unreasonable to copyright something that simple.

Headlines are even worse, because they're the piece's name. If headlines fall under copyright, it becomes potentially illegal to talk about a news article. That makes copyrighting a standard font library look downright logical.

Re:High Court ruling implies headlines are copyright by ig1 on Saturday November 27, 2010 @08:54PM (#1946403)
Citation for the purpose of discussing the piece is likely to fall under the protection of fair use/fair dealing exceptions under copyright law.
Re:High Court ruling implies headlines are copyright by chc on Saturday November 27, 2010 @11:39PM (#1946682)
If describing the destination of a link is a potential violation, I would be very nervous about anything qualifying as fair use — as I said, any use I can think of for a headline should either qualify as fair (if it's for the purpose of identifying the article) or be almost impossible to establish as an intentional infringement in most cases due to the fact that it's five-ish tightly constrained words.