News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Army applying new areas of math by Fomite on Friday March 22, 2019 @03:40AM (#19460303)
For the record, given I'm at a university with 56% overhead, this is:

- Often less than corporate research. I know because I've also worked with them.

- Pays for things like startup packages for new faculty, administrative support, things shared by multiple groups, etc. (as well as, without a doubt, some waste, but I mean, private research companies have that too).

- Is negotiated in advance with the government.

- Is often less than the cost of doing research.

Re:US Army applying new areas of math by kriro on Friday March 22, 2019 @06:17AM (#19461054)
For comparison, German federal government research grants (from the BMBF) explicitly have a 20% markup that is reserved for non-research stuff. Typically this goes to the university to cover the offices of the employees who work on the project and into a fund for other stuff (grant application overhead etc). The rest is all used for salaries and project specific investments.

Theoretically that's pretty good. However if you look at a lot of the research projects you kind of scratch your head at the actual output (which imo is the real problem).

Re:US Army applying new areas of math by LeanderK on Friday March 22, 2019 @06:50AM (#19461235)
>However if you look at a lot of the research projects you kind of scratch your head at the actual output (which imo is the real problem).

Can you elaborate? What do you mean?