News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A brief history of why artists are no longer making a liv... by Swizec on Friday March 22, 2019 @12:37AM (#19459651)
That's like those people who disable JavaScript in their browser. Yes you can get through life without using SaaS and you will likely be fine. But you can also join the 21st century and get on with your life.

I like that I can pay for software based on how much I use it rather than ponying up hundreds of thousands of dollars once. A lot of the cheaper end SaaS-es could never ever be sustainable without the monthly subscription business model. Particularly because they themselves use SaaS and have to keep the lights on.

Imagine if isntead of paying a monthly fee to use whatever services companies use to run their company they'd be required to build everything in house? Ain't nobody got the funds for that.

Re:A brief history of why artists are no longer making a liv... by mirimir on Friday March 22, 2019 @01:27AM (#19459856)
Yes, I get that. And maybe it works out OK, most of the time. But I've surely seen lots of horror stories on HN.

Also, building in-house isn't that expensive. Or at least, not compared to developing in-house. I'm not all that technical, and I setup my own Docker registry, for example.

I am one of those people who only allow minimal required JavaScript :)

Re:A brief history of why artists are no longer making a liv... by Swizec on Friday March 22, 2019 @01:50AM (#19459927)
I think it’s about opportunity cost. It’s often cheaper to outsource everything not-core and focus your time and attention on the things only you can do. Where “you” is whatever you consider the relevant company/team/businessunit.

Can I build a website? Yes. Can I save money by paying someone to build a website and focus instead on filling it with great content? You bet.

Same applies for SaaS. It would be a waste of time/money/effort to build my own ConvertKit for example

Re:A brief history of why artists are no longer making a liv... by mirimir on Friday March 22, 2019 @02:11AM (#19459996)
There's a huge difference between outsourcing and SaaS. Sure, it's cheaper to pay someone to build your website. That's outsourcing. But then you run it on a server that you lease. If it's running on something managed by a third party, it can just disappear. And that's SaaS.

There's also the issue of sharing sensitive data with SaaS providers. Just think of all the data leaks that's caused. The Squarespace heatmap stuff we just saw. The deals between Google and phone manufacturers. The behavioral-ad-delivery morass.

Re ConvertKit, the alternative would look like "git clone foo".