Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by ericsoderstrom on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:17PM
(#19454059)
I don't see a huge difference between the two. Mostly the Ferengi forehead creases are sharper I guess, but unclear that the overall effect is much of an improvement. Cool proof of concept though!
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by rhacker on Thursday March 21, 2019 @01:33PM
(#19455026)
Definitely make sure you switch YouTube's AUTO setting from whatever default it has to 1080P. For a lot of scenes there is a HUGE difference.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by devrod on Thursday March 21, 2019 @03:18PM
(#19456246)
Thanks for this, I also didn't think they looked any different.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by __david__ on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:57PM
(#19454557)
Yeah I made sure the video was in 1080p mode and it was mostly subtle at best. Not only that there were several places where it wasn't subtle, but the up-rezzed faces had a super fake photo-retouched/cgi look to them. They had crossed the uncanny-valley and didn't look like real humans.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by eropple on Thursday March 21, 2019 @02:33PM
(#19455775)
I thought that faces were mostly fine. The spots that didn't look right, to me, were when there was a face out-of-focus in the front of the frame (the bit where Sisko's talking to that dude). I wonder if the network recognized it was "supposed" to be out-of-focus, which it is, but then wasn't able to do any edge cleanup to make it more consistent.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by Sargos on Thursday March 21, 2019 @05:38PM
(#19457622)
> didn't look like real humans
Deep Space Nine. Mission succeeded?
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by izzydata on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:22PM
(#19454121)
You need to have both full screened on a 1080p screen to actually compare the two. Also video quality is difficult to determine from still frames. Video compression is more about how it moves from 1 frame to another. You would want to watch an actual clip of both to see the difference better.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by ericsoderstrom on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:36PM
(#19454288)
Yeah that's probably it. Was wondering whether half a screen of 1080p would be enough to properly show the difference
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by NedIsakoff on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:25PM
(#19454153)
I honestly really don't see the difference beyond that.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by eropple on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:39PM
(#19454334)
A lot of the CG (ships, etc.) looks sharper to my eye. I didn't notice at first, though, because YouTube defaulted to 720p (and since it's a 1080p render downscaled to be side-by-side, you do need those pixels).
The creator says that 4K-vs-480p renders (that is, rendering the YouTube video at 4K) are on the way.
Re:Remastering Star Trek: Deep Space Nine with Machine Learning
by QuackingJimbo on Thursday March 21, 2019 @08:04PM
(#19458546)
Same. It's certainly not objectively "amazing" (to use the author's own verbiage)