News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by saalweachter on Thursday March 21, 2019 @11:18AM (#19453318)
I'd indeed say it costs more than most people are willing to pay.

That said, a sleeper car on Amtrak gets you: a flat surface to lie down on, your own toilet (note the toilet is just there in the roomette, next to the bunk, prison style), access to a shower (your own shower in the rooms, one per car for the roomettes), access to the first class lounges, and includes meals in the dining car.

Rooms have a slightly wider lower bunk versus roomettes to sleep 2 (skinny) people and an enclosed toilet so you don't lose mystery from your romantic or work relationships. Roomettes are too small for a first world prison cell but have the beds oriented parallel to the direction of travel, which many people find more comfortable -- the rocking of the train is more soothing and less jarring.

If you have the time, don't mind paying four-star hotel prices for a two-star experience, and hate flying or have a medical condition that makes it infeasible you should definitely consider it.

Or, if you're on this site, it's a great excuse to sit in a small room with a view and not talk to anyone for several days, just read, write and program.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by jfim on Thursday March 21, 2019 @02:21PM (#19455597)
> Or, if you're on this site, it's a great excuse to sit in a small room with a view and not talk to anyone for several days, just read, write and program.

With spotty cellphone reception, so if you want to disconnect from constant connectivity that's also an interesting way.

It's a great experience, but if you're thinking of just sitting in there and programming in a room with a view, keep in mind that the scenery changes and is pretty amazing, which might distract you from programming.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by jplayer01 on Thursday March 21, 2019 @11:38AM (#19453570)
> Or, if you're on this site, it's a great excuse to sit in a small room with a view and not talk to anyone for several days, just read, write and program.

This sounds like fun. I wonder if there are any European routes that are as long/uninterrupted that I could try that on.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by lmm on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:19PM (#19454093)
Not really - the only trains taking longer than 24 hours in Europe are the sleepers to Moscow, and the longest of those (Nice-Moscow) only takes 48 hours. There are then much longer trains from Moscow into Asia though, up to the famous Trans-Siberian (6 days).

I went London-Japan overland but my longest single segment was two and a half days (Moscow-Shymkent), and that was about right - time to relax and do nothing for a bit, but by the third morning I had definitely spent enough time in the same compartment, as nice as it was.

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by dboreham on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:35PM (#19454276)
>I wonder if there are any European routes that are as long/uninterrupted that I could try that on.

The London to Ft. William sleeper, when there's leaves on the line?

Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by vertex-four on Thursday March 21, 2019 @01:59PM (#19455332)
Not really within the EU - we have reasonably fast rail that prioritises passenger travel over freight - but e.g. Moscow to Beijing takes 6 or 7 nights, and you could get to Moscow itself by sleeper train if you're up for it.
Re:There is no reason to cross the U.S. by train, but I did ... by selimthegrim on Thursday March 21, 2019 @01:38PM (#19455082)
This. I’m taking the train from Tucson to New Orleans in a few days and am looking forward to ~40 uninterrupted hours.