Re:Four Wikipedias to ‘Black Out’ over EU Copyright Directive
by koonsolo on Thursday March 21, 2019 @06:11AM
(#19450575)
> as said elsewhere, article 13 is probably all good news for YouTube
This part is not clear to me. On one hand they are big enough to prevent copyrighted material being published. They could also offer filtering services to smaller parties.
But on the other hand, YouTube is still full of copyrighted material. You can find basically any videoclip, cd-rip, or anything else on there. There are even entire movie rips on there, that regularly get deleted.
Do they currently pay some big license owner a fee for this? I don't think so (but I'm not sure).
So if this article 13 passes, YouTube will have to remove all of this material. Not only that, but they have to prevent such material being published in the first place. Or somehow make sure that a certain videoclip/cd-rip is payed off to the proper license owner.
I'm not sure if it's even possible for YouTube to make such a filter, without having either a lot of false negatives or positives.
This part is not clear to me. On one hand they are big enough to prevent copyrighted material being published. They could also offer filtering services to smaller parties.
But on the other hand, YouTube is still full of copyrighted material. You can find basically any videoclip, cd-rip, or anything else on there. There are even entire movie rips on there, that regularly get deleted. Do they currently pay some big license owner a fee for this? I don't think so (but I'm not sure).
So if this article 13 passes, YouTube will have to remove all of this material. Not only that, but they have to prevent such material being published in the first place. Or somehow make sure that a certain videoclip/cd-rip is payed off to the proper license owner.
I'm not sure if it's even possible for YouTube to make such a filter, without having either a lot of false negatives or positives.