Re:Scientists rise up against statistical significance
by blunte on Wednesday March 20, 2019 @10:07PM
(#19448744)
I must be stupid. It feels like a Monty Python word game designed to confuse. There's no way I can not disbelieve a statistically insignificant study outcome unless I want to allow myself to believe in some (but which ones?) statistically insignificant ones.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Scientists rise up against statistical significance
by thedataangel on Thursday March 21, 2019 @12:45AM
(#19449335)
The key is that there is a distinction between "not statistically significant" and "statistically insignificant".