Re:Screwed up incentives in higher education
by dschobel on Saturday November 27, 2010 @01:26AM
(#1944441)
It's not athletics; at a large state school those programs bring in a heap more money than they cost to operate.
Re:Screwed up incentives in higher education
by yequalsx on Saturday November 27, 2010 @02:30AM
(#1944532)
Athletics are a money loser for all but 15 or so universities.
Re:Screwed up incentives in higher education
by desigooner on Sunday November 28, 2010 @08:38AM
(#1947331)
For a lot many schools, the donations and fund raising increases as they have a better athletic presence. In the long run, athletics doesn't really lose money for the school. Athletics at a lot many schools are self-sustaining.. especially after cutting off a few sports that were a moneysink. Big Time Athletics is Big Business these days with sponsorships, TV revenue, ticket sales, advertising and elicited donations.
There are many reasons why schools have become more expensive over the years. The cost of health care, alone, is growing much faster than the rate of inflation.
But honestly, most universities went on a building spree over the last twenty years. Fancy dorms and labs and classrooms and athletic facilities really start to add up -- and grants rarely pay for them. As I said before, there are tons of inefficiencies in the university system. I just don't think they're in the classroom.