Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today
by dearrifling on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @04:15PM
(#19435281)
You can have unrelated commits and roots in a single git repo. No need for empty root commit.
Re:Continuous Unix commit history from 1970 until today
by yebyen on Tuesday March 19, 2019 @04:52PM
(#19435727)
I think the payoff is for merging unrelated histories, that you can then rebase one history on the other, and present a new unified history.
Is the really only reason why people do this, so that you can rewrite your initial working commit in a rebase? I think that might be it. (You can't easily rewrite the initial commit with a rebase.)
Immediately after `git init`, do `git commit --allow-empty -m"initial empty commit"`. Now you have an empty commit, and any other repo which has this empty commit has some history in common with your repo.
The SHA-1 hash is well-known and there are plenty of articles you can find about it, if you search for 4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904
Here's one for example:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9765453/is-gits-semi-sec...
I'm not sure this helps for projects which have a shared development history, but not a shared commit history. But within an organization, where you have projects which may split and/or merge, it can help to bridge some gaps.