Re:Trading privacy for survival is another tax on the poor
by danans on Monday March 18, 2019 @07:48PM
(#19426548)
Suggesting that someone take care when using historical allusions they don't understand is not the same as questioning someone's intentions.
Read the thread again: Once it was clear that they were legitimately unaware of the origin of the allusion they made, the suggestion I made was to be careful in general using such allusions.
> You should be careful
You're doing some serious backflips there. As if he isn't being careful enough for your taste. That's just useless drivel.