Re:Trading privacy for survival is another tax on the poor
by clairity on Monday March 18, 2019 @03:29PM
(#19424317)
> "...employers have to invest more in supervising low-productivity workers."
why do you believe these workers are low-productivity? are they unworthy of dignity and privacy as a result?
why do you believe the employers are qualified supervisors? have you never had a bad manager? might it be possible that the employers have no idea how to encourage productivity, and that low productivity is induced by a coercive and surveilled work environment?
so many assumptions packed into those little words...
why do you believe these workers are low-productivity? are they unworthy of dignity and privacy as a result?
why do you believe the employers are qualified supervisors? have you never had a bad manager? might it be possible that the employers have no idea how to encourage productivity, and that low productivity is induced by a coercive and surveilled work environment?
so many assumptions packed into those little words...