Re:Alan Kay on the Meaning of “Object-Oriented Programming” ...
by macintux on Sunday March 17, 2019 @05:42PM
(#19416828)
I don't think I've watched it previously, and I don't have the time to now, but I have to imagine Joe Armstrong interviewing Alan Kay would at least touch on that (although from one comment it sounds like they didn't do more than that).
Re:Alan Kay on the Meaning of “Object-Oriented Programming” ...
by jimbokun on Sunday March 17, 2019 @10:11PM
(#19418210)
Watch it!
I just watched the whole thing, based on just seeing your link.
It does talk about the historical connections between Smalltalk and Erlang, but goes far beyond that to remind us to think more about the bigger problems we need to solve, and get less caught up in doing things just because we have a tool that can do them or other people are doing things that way.
I found it truly inspiring.
Re:Alan Kay on the Meaning of “Object-Oriented Programming” ...
by rudedogg on Sunday March 17, 2019 @06:09PM
(#19417019)
> Alan, if you're in the comments section I'd love to hear your thoughts on what you think of the resurgence of functional programming in the modern day and whether anything, other than perhaps languages like Erlang, has approached your original ideal
Someone asked a similar question when he did an AMA, but the answer wasn't clear to me:
Alan, if you're in the comments section I'd love to hear your thoughts on what you think of the resurgence of functional programming in the modern day and whether anything, other than perhaps languages like Erlang, has approached your original ideal.