News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Moving Back to Lighttpd by yjftsjthsd-h on Sunday March 17, 2019 @02:35PM (#19415539)
Depends what you're doing. If you just want "http server" of some kind, then either is fine. Sure, features vary, but how much does it actually matter? Yeah, http2 is nice, newer compression is good, ... features matter, but for a lot of uses it really doesn't make a noticeable impact.
Re:Moving Back to Lighttpd by msbarnett on Sunday March 17, 2019 @04:20PM (#19416305)
If you just want a bare bones http server of any kind, nginx is probably overkill in the first place.
Re:Moving Back to Lighttpd by majewsky on Sunday March 17, 2019 @05:18PM (#19416682)
I would argue the opposite: Anything but nginx is probably overkill unless you have specific requirements. I mean, sure, if you just want to serve some files from a development machine into the intranet right now, `python -m http.server` will do the trick. But for anything that is either a productive system, or one serving content to the public internet, nginx is a sane default choice.
Re:Moving Back to Lighttpd by msbarnett on Sunday March 17, 2019 @05:49PM (#19416877)
For a production system facing the public, lightttpd strikes me as inappropriate.

Any of the “I don’t care how poorly it supports modern browsers, I just need something barebones that speaks http” usecases the person I was responding to seemed to be suggesting would typically be something like a local dev http server, or a barebones http server sitting behind a more robust proxy.

Which brings us back to, for those usecases, nginx is probably overkill.