News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Simple kernel attack: Eat 100% CPU, works under guest, no... by johnswamps on Thursday November 25, 2010 @05:04PM (#1941108)
I'm not sure why : has been chosen as the canonical fork bomb function name, but it's more readable with something like

resurse() { recurse | recurse &}; recurse

Re:Simple kernel attack: Eat 100% CPU, works under guest, no... by marbu on Thursday November 25, 2010 @06:44PM (#1941267)
In this example, the poor readability is a feature. Nevertheless the ":" character is bash inner function, which tells the shell to do nothing (except the arguments expansion), like pass in python. This means that you can redefine it and use it to confuse others. Most of other special characters are not functions so you are not able to redefine them that easily.
Re:Simple kernel attack: Eat 100% CPU, works under guest, no... by kmort on Thursday November 25, 2010 @05:58PM (#1941188)
And it's usually accompanied by the adjective "elegant", which I find rather baffling.

"Cute" or "cryptic", perhaps.