>> It's not a secret that women's employment is largely counterproductive by itself

This kind of sexism can be quite harmful. You might want to rethink this one.

>> They could do all the things described in the article for their working husbands.

True, but there's no obvious reason why it shouldn't be men who do these things for their working wives. Why should one half of a marriage devote their time and effort to the other half's success rather than having their own success as well?

Their success is measured in different terms: in having children (more children than parents for sustained population). In this most important regard, they have failed.

If you continue to troll HN we will ban your main account as well.

I hate to break it to you, hoss, but income and productivity are not the same thing. Productivity has continued to grow at a reasonable pace since the "Civil Rights Era". Meanwhile, incomes stagnated. I.e., what you said is exactly inverted.

http://i2.cdn.turner.com/money/dam/assets/150709122537-produ...