Re:Our Thoughts on the New Zealand Massacre
by benj111 on Saturday March 16, 2019 @03:42AM
(#19406820)
The rules as described and as implemented don't match. Saying you're doing something, when that something makes no sense and is unreasonable isn't transparency.
Wikipedia's opening paragraph on transparency:
"Transparency, as used in science, engineering, business, the
humanities and in other social contexts, is operating in such a way that it is easy for others to see what actions are performed. Transparency implies openness, communication, and accountability.
"[1]
There is neither openness or accountability in my example.
Yes in a narrow sense it is transparent, in the wider (I would say, most important) sense, it isn't.
Wikipedia's opening paragraph on transparency:
"Transparency, as used in science, engineering, business, the humanities and in other social contexts, is operating in such a way that it is easy for others to see what actions are performed. Transparency implies openness, communication, and accountability. "[1]
There is neither openness or accountability in my example.
Yes in a narrow sense it is transparent, in the wider (I would say, most important) sense, it isn't.
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transparency_(behavior)