News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RFC8482 – Saying Goodbye to ANY by mehrdadn on Friday March 15, 2019 @06:14PM (#19404817)
Could someone explain why standards are "RFC"s? Can't anyone request comments for something? Why would a request for comments be treated as a standard?
Re:RFC8482 – Saying Goodbye to ANY by pas on Friday March 15, 2019 @06:20PM (#19404853)
not all RFCs are standards. RFCs that become one are labeled as STD and a number, but nobody uses those (afaik)

https://www.ietf.org/rfc/std-index.txt

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Standard

Re:RFC8482 – Saying Goodbye to ANY by wnissen on Friday March 15, 2019 @06:51PM (#19405059)
Because the internet used to be unimaginably small. It really was just a couple of researchers talking to each other. They weren't co-located (the entire point of internetworking) so they had to mail stuff to each other, but it was more like when you send a copy of a document to your co-worker down the hall. "Hey, Jane, watcha think about this?" The first telnet (predecessor to SSH) RFC was 9 pages, including an example of the connection handshake.
Re:RFC8482 – Saying Goodbye to ANY by hak8or on Friday March 15, 2019 @07:30PM (#19405311)
Years ago when the internet was still a bunch of universities, the main few folks working in the network were often times tuning hardware like routers. I do not remember what the first rfc was about, but it was genuinely a "request for comments" document mailed it to others. Ever since then it stuck.
Re:RFC8482 – Saying Goodbye to ANY by ZWoz on Saturday March 16, 2019 @10:52AM (#19408079)
If you are interested history behind RFCs and early Internet, I suggest reading "Where wizards stay up late: the origins of the Internet" from Katie Hafner and Matthew Lyon. Thats good book about arpanet formation and how arpanet and other networks together became Internet.