So instead of interpreting his intentions using a straightforward plausible explanation supported by his manifesto, you suggest that it is better to interpret his motivations using an unfounded conspiracy theory?

I just find it unseemly to give so much headspace to whatever he said in his memo. Consider not allowing his irrelevant arguments influence how and why you are disconcerted.

IMHO suggesting that OP delete their comment is giving that proverbial ball another nudge.

Can you see the irony in all four posts? (from OP to mine)