News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why we made this site by jmzachary on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @05:33PM (#194)
Thanks for the rationale. I'm most interested in the ARC aspect of the site.
Re:Why we made this site by ninwa on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @06:30PM (#205)
Really? I was most interested in the role that news.ycombinator.com is going to play in their application process. I think that it's an absolutely great idea and not only helps Paul but start-up-would-be's as well.
Re:Why we made this site by jmzachary on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @06:46PM (#210)
Yes, really. That's not to say I'm uninterested in the role that news.ycombinator will play in their application process, too. Once word gets out, it will be very interesting to see what kind of traffic is posted and how the signal/noise ratio changes.
Re:Why we made this site by ninwa on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @06:41PM (#209)
This comment added through the comment page of a new news story. Note: If you came from the news story, click comment up above. : )
Re:Why we made this site by jwecker on Wednesday February 21, 2007 @06:52PM (#422)
OK, here's the question, pg, is this site actually running on a lightweight webserver written in ARC, or did you tie ARC into apache or something for the application logic and storage? Or did you use ARC as a markup language? Just curious.
Re:Why we made this site by pg on Thursday February 22, 2007 @04:17PM (#540)
The server's written in Arc too. I wanted to learn how to write one.
Re:Why we made this site by ozten on Friday February 23, 2007 @06:59PM (#790)
I thought you might have written the server, since their isn't too much fat in the HTTP headers :) You should add a Server header for bragging rights though.

Congrats to you and your team on launching the first Arc app regardless of how much of the stack is written in Arc.

Re:Why we made this site by jadams on Thursday February 22, 2007 @06:29PM (#567)
Can you tell us what kind of editor you're using to write Arc (and Arc code).

Is Arc suited to writing its own IDE?

Re:Why we made this site by pg on Thursday February 22, 2007 @08:29PM (#587)
editor: vi, ide: repl
Re:Why we made this site by byronsalty on Saturday March 31, 2007 @04:31PM (#7884)
I'm having trouble using drakma to hit the site. I'm pretty new to Lisp so I'm still learning what I'm looking at, however it looks like something in the stream from the server (possibly while reading headers?) is messing up CHUNGA:READLINE which Drakma uses.
Re:Why we made this site by jwecker on Thursday February 22, 2007 @04:22PM (#542)
in that case, I _am_ excited about Arc's progress ;)
Re:Why we made this site by kingkongrevenge on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @12:07PM (#1537)
Do you find mzscheme plays well with pthreads, or have you another concurrency approach?
Re:Why we made this site by jadams on Thursday February 22, 2007 @06:33PM (#569)
Can you tell us what kind of editor you're using to write Arc (and Arc code).

Is Arc suited to writing its own IDE?

Re:Why we made this site by Zak on Tuesday February 20, 2007 @05:48PM (#199)
I don't think the fact that the site is written in Arc makes the site itself any more interesting. Arc is interesting, as is the fact that it's to the point where it could be used to make this site.
Re:Why we made this site by bootload on Wednesday February 28, 2007 @10:55PM (#1644)
'... I don't think the fact that the site is written in Arc makes the site itself any more interesting. ...'

I do. I'm pretty sure the site, layout & idea have been inspired by the defection from lisp to python ~ http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/rewritingreddit

As the site progresses it proves a point. That "Reddit" could have continued in Lisp had they persisted and that "Lisp -like languages", can still cut it.

Re:Why we made this site by pg on Friday March 02, 2007 @06:15PM (#1897)
It does in a sense, because it makes it faster to add new features.