Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by tdmule on Friday March 15, 2019 @12:39AM
(#19396625)
Ed Yong rocks. Another well written science piece that is easy to digest without drifting into sensationalism.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by sohkamyung on Friday March 15, 2019 @04:45AM
(#19397808)
Ed Yong's book, "I Contain Multitudes" is also a good read about the microbiome.
I believe he is in the process of writing another book, this one on the animal senses [1]
[1] https://twitter.com/edyong209/status/1096410078033465351
Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by vibrio on Friday March 15, 2019 @09:51AM
(#19399668)
I am also a fan of Yong, but "Upends what we know about virues" is a bit sensational. The article interesting for sure, but lately it seems that every book or study "turns Darwin on his head" or puts us in a "post-Pasteur era". I"m not even going to think about Cacner headlines. All overstatement of interesting science findings.
upend (ŭp-ĕndˈ) v.To stand, set, or turn on one end: upend an oblong box. v.To invalidate, destroy, or change completely; overthrow: upended a popular legend. v.To win victory over; defeat.
Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by overthemoon on Friday March 15, 2019 @10:39AM
(#19400090)
Can't say for sure re this article, but often editors choose headlines.
Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by vibrio on Friday March 15, 2019 @11:36AM
(#19400637)
Sure, but as far as I'm concerned if you get the byline you own the content. Again I like Yong, not faulting him but rather a general trend in media.
I'm being a science curmudgeon.
Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by majkinetor on Friday March 15, 2019 @03:39PM
(#19403423)
So, distributed virus that keeps specialized factories around and ships products to other parts of the "world" is just another fact od life?
Re:A New Discovery Upends What We Know About Viruses
by vibrio on Monday March 18, 2019 @09:22AM
(#19420770)
I said in my initial post that it was interesting. I don't think it "invalidates, destroys, or changes completely what we know about viruses". My gripe is with the sensational, click-bait title.