Re:Facebook Loses Top Executives, Including Chris Cox
by abraae on Thursday March 14, 2019 @10:36PM
(#19395951)
That's a pretty dark view.
I imagine that Gates played to win in business, as many others do, it's just that he was particularly good at it.
Now he's playing hard and to win in philanthropy.
I doubt he gives 2 bits what the average person thinks of him, at least not enough to throw money at rehabilitating his image. If that was his goal, his philanthropy targets would be different.
Re:Facebook Loses Top Executives, Including Chris Cox
by praneshp on Thursday March 14, 2019 @07:16PM
(#19394863)
Right, the then world's richest started a charitable trust purely so he could improve his public image.
Re:Facebook Loses Top Executives, Including Chris Cox
by dralley on Thursday March 14, 2019 @08:50PM
(#19395428)
I'm sure the competitive drive to dominate (in generosity) plays a role. Look at the rivalry between Rockefeller and Carnegie for example. Once they grew old and their companies either bought out (Carnegie) or broken up by the feds (Rockefeller) they basically switched to seeing who could get their names put on the most public buildings by building libraries, universities, etc.
Re:Facebook Loses Top Executives, Including Chris Cox
by ficklepickle on Thursday March 14, 2019 @08:54PM
(#19395452)
What else is he going to do? At that level of wealth, the marginal returns on greed have diminished to almost zero.
So one must find another way to feed ones ego. What is left apart from fulfilling the god complex and saving the world?
Edit: has->have
What’s surprising to me is that it still works!