Re:Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville
by paxys on Thursday March 14, 2019 @03:33PM
(#19392726)
Trying new products in small markets as an experiment has been a thing forever, and is something literally every company does regularly. There is nothing weird about it. As for the fallout, IMO the city is to blame for it more than Google, since the company is obligated to do exactly what the contract entails.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville
by tzs on Thursday March 14, 2019 @04:30PM
(#19393346)
Yeah, but when a soda company, say, tries out one new flavor in my town, and different new flavor in your town, and mine flops and yours succeeds, they don't just stop selling soda in my town. They start selling the flavor from your test in my town, too.
It would have risked much less bad publicity if they had done the 2" experiments in a city they were willing to use 6" trenching in. Do part of the deployment with 2" and part with 6", and if the 2" part doesn't work redo that part with 6".
Re:Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville
by 908087 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @07:20PM
(#19394894)
Soda companies also don't leave deteriorating trenches behind on the roads in town when their tests fail.
Re:Visible signs left after Google Fiber abandons Louisville
by op00to on Thursday March 14, 2019 @04:33PM
(#19393383)
I think what's different is typically cable/phone companies have been reluctant to give up on their investment so easily. This is probably somehow due to the past and present monopolies they hold. Google, like the honey badger, don't care.