Re:Amazon Pulls Books That Promote Unscientific Autism ‘Cures’
by ashleyn on Thursday March 14, 2019 @02:36PM
(#19392073)
You're not under any obligation to. Amazon isn't really a monopoly. The only "sin" they've committed is refusing to cooperate with the implications and consequences of listing pseudoscience on their own best seller list amid a public health crisis rooted in populist ignorance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Amazon Pulls Books That Promote Unscientific Autism ‘Cures’
by ptero on Thursday March 14, 2019 @02:50PM
(#19392253)
> Amazon isn't really a monopoly.
I would completely agree with what you said about the rights of the private companies if Amazon was a regular market player. But even you qualified above statement. Even though Amazon is not really a monopoly, it is pretty close for small scale book selling. That is, it has such a dominant market share that its decision not to sell a book can be a death sentence for a small book publisher. Thus they should be super careful when culling titles by content -- next time they might pull <insert your favorite hot topic> and there will be no recourse either.