News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by ehaliewicz2 on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @09:35PM (#19385779)
Imagine you had a laptop or desktop where you could only install apps that were approved by the hardware manufacturer or os developer. Would you really be ok with that?

If not, how is it any different from the phone?

Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by scarface74 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @08:29AM (#19388586)
And that was part of the advantage of the phone. I’m not cleaning crapware and viruses from my parents and children’s phones and tablets every six months.

Do you feel that console makers shouldn’t be allowed to dictate what runs on their devices? Yes physical discs still have to be approved by the console maker. It’s been that way for 30 years.

Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by ehaliewicz2 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @01:20PM (#19391329)
> Do you feel that console makers shouldn’t be allowed to dictate what runs on their devices? Yes physical discs still have to be approved by the console maker. It’s been that way for 30 years.

Yes of course. Either allow the user full control of the hardware they apparently own, or call it what it really is, renting.

Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by scarface74 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @02:13PM (#19391837)
So is that also the case for my exercise equipment, my TV, my car, my car radio, my cable box, my printer, etc?
Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by ehaliewicz2 on Friday March 15, 2019 @01:32AM (#19396854)
I'd say that the person in favor of restricting someone's use of their own hardware needs to come up with the argument in support of that, not the other way around.

You could have an argument in the case of a car, for safety. Cable box perhaps, but I'd say that should probably be considered a case of renting hardware for it to really make sense.

Car radio or printer, etc? Nothing comes to mind.

Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by rickycook on Thursday March 14, 2019 @12:49AM (#19386599)
a laptop is not a tablet, a tablet is not a phone, a phone is not a watch; that’s part of apple’s philosophy behind how their devices work together. knock it all you want (and there are legitimate criticisms), but it works remarkably well and makes all these devices feel like they have a natural place and purpose

*EDIT: i’m not saying “place and purpose” is a reason why macos and ios have different security models, but just pointing out that “why is a laptop different to a phone” is not reeeeeeally a particularly valid place to start

Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by ehaliewicz2 on Thursday March 14, 2019 @01:20PM (#19391337)
They're both computers. One is smaller than the other, therefore it shouldn't allow you to run whatever apps you want? That's a ridiculous idea.
Re:Spotify to Apple: Time to Play Fair by tripzilch on Thursday March 14, 2019 @01:38PM (#19391508)
> it works remarkably well and makes all these devices feel like they have a natural place and purpose

Um really those are artificial, not natural. The nature of the devices is that they're still general purpose computers, the artificial restrictions on them give them an artificial place and purpose. It's still a thing, but Apple isn't magically altering reality.