News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:U.S. to ground Boeing 737 Max 8 by subhro on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @03:26PM (#19382617)
Probably not completely true. An airfoil stalls when the critical angle of attack is exceeded. For most airfoils, this sits at around 17°. For all commercial aircrafts (I think 727 onwards) there is a mechanism called stick pusher that will not allow an airfoil to go over critical AoA. I am not sure if this has been overridden somwhere in the 737 Max 8 though.
Re:U.S. to ground Boeing 737 Max 8 by sangnoir on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @11:13PM (#19386256)
I was describing the physical "bug" Boeing was solving in software: MCAS is a stick-pusher because it forces down the nose - which led to the Lion air crash because of a faulty AoA sensor made MCAS avoid an imaginary stall, forcing the nose down into a powered flight into terrain.
Re:U.S. to ground Boeing 737 Max 8 by tostr on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @03:34PM (#19382738)
Are you saying 17deg from horizontal? Let's ignore wind and other influences. A normal plane can not climb more steeply than 17deg?

I'm not implying you're wrong, just very surprised to see this low a number. I would have guessed much closer to something like 45deg, maybe even more.

Re:U.S. to ground Boeing 737 Max 8 by subhro on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @03:40PM (#19382806)
The Angle of Attack is defined as the angle between relative wind and chord of an airfoil. So if your engine has enough juice to climb at 45° (and many aerobatic aircrafts do), your relative wind is coming at 45° from ground, but almost at 0° with respect to the chord. So your wing is still flying.

Let me know if that makes sense.