News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:JIT-Less V8 by kllrnohj on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @01:53PM (#19381444)
> The security implications of RWX memory are just so bad

Such as? Any practical examples here?

Code executions is code execution. RWX just lets you execute faster code, it doesn't give you any privileges or permissions you didn't otherwise already have.

Re:JIT-Less V8 by gok on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @02:27PM (#19381836)
Re:JIT-Less V8 by kllrnohj on Wednesday March 13, 2019 @04:08PM (#19383188)
Which didn't need RWX by using ROP chains instead...?

The security vulnerability there was that the process had the ability to invoke shell at all, not how they got to invoking shell. In-process sandboxing isn't a thing anymore, spectre proved that. In that context what risk does RWX actually pose?