News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GitHub Status – Incident on 2019-03-12 by debt on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @01:35PM (#19370777)
"the person's politics"

I interpreted it as a how a person deals with internal politics not what their political views are. the latter would most definitely be illegal.

Re:GitHub Status – Incident on 2019-03-12 by ambulancechaser on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @01:47PM (#19370928)
from the OP > It stands for “emotional quotient” and they ask you a bunch of questions about diversity, feminism... They watch your responses for tone and vocabulary and can veto your hire if they deem you insufficiently enthusiastic.

It sounds very much like your opinions on current political topics.

Re:GitHub Status – Incident on 2019-03-12 by extra88 on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @01:47PM (#19370932)
I don't think the latter* is illegal because it's not discrimination against a member of a protected class. That doesn't make it okay or that it couldn't lead to other trouble.
Re:GitHub Status – Incident on 2019-03-12 by zephharben on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @02:01PM (#19371120)
California law provides some protection from discrimination by employers based on political affiliation or activities. NY state and Washington DC have similar statutes.
Re:GitHub Status – Incident on 2019-03-12 by delinka on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @05:28PM (#19373230)
But it’s not “affiliation” nor “activities.” It’s “is their stance on topic X compatible with ours?”

Still terrible. Still not illegal.