Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by toomuchtodo on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @10:47AM
(#19368625)
Which is why you don’t host it on AWS. Wrong tool for the job.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by TheKarateKid on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @12:58PM
(#19370321)
Their Github page specifically mentions AWS S3 as a requirement. So they are using it.
Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by twic on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @01:23PM
(#19370632)
It mentions "AWS S3 or compatible service". The S3 API is a de facto standard for object storage services, and there are numerous implementations of it.
Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by sethhochberg on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @03:40PM
(#19372120)
(Including many which you can easily self-host like Minio, for those who are following along at home and weren't sure whether that was just limited to other cloud services)
Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by coderunner on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @02:28PM
(#19371392)
Is there a cheaper S3 alternative that you recommend or that Mozilla's likely using instead?
Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by Rebelgecko on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @02:51PM
(#19371649)
I think Backblaze's cloud storage is the cheapest I've seen. Microsoft and Google would also be a bit cheaper than S3
Re:Firefox Send: Free encrypted file transfer service
by toomuchtodo on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @03:19PM
(#19371935)
As you mentioned, huge fan of Backblaze B2. No affiliation, just a satisfied customer. Can also pair it with Cloudflare for even less expensive traffic serving.
https://www.backblaze.com/blog/backblaze-and-cloudflare-part...