Don't put words in my mouth. I called out parent's dismissal tone which adds nothing to the debate and provided studies to back what I wrote.
Meanwhile your comment also adds nothing to the debate by going straight to personal attacks and a vague dismissal of one of the linked studies.
To stay on topic:
Could you provide a study that disproves collateral damages, be it with to health or simply economic, to non-smokers?
Are you sure you don't see any methodological issues with this study & those claims? Cuz I see a lot.
>Dismissing discussions about impacts of smoking as moralistic is borderline disingenuous
Please consider avoiding backhandedly calling people liars.