News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Vaping Is big tobacco’s bait and switch by 01100011 on Monday March 11, 2019 @12:50AM (#19356768)
Love to see a reference for that. Scientific American had an article a while back saying exactly the opposite.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-nicotine-all-b...

FWIW, my friend's psychiatrist recommends nicotine gum.

Re:Vaping Is big tobacco’s bait and switch by elp on Monday March 11, 2019 @02:19AM (#19357052)
Ummm... I see the article was written by a Kate Kelland from Reuters?

Was this same person? "Reuters’ reporter Kate Kelland, who has a history of cozy relations with a group partly funded by agrichemical company interests," ( https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/monsanto-spin-doctors-t...)

Re:Vaping Is big tobacco’s bait and switch by sosilkj on Monday March 11, 2019 @01:24AM (#19356880)
Re:Vaping Is big tobacco’s bait and switch by shereadsthenews on Monday March 11, 2019 @01:13AM (#19356851)
Re:Vaping Is big tobacco’s bait and switch by wahern on Monday March 11, 2019 @03:33AM (#19357283)
> Experimental group of mice received subcutaneous injections of the LD50 dose of (−)nicotine hydrogen tartrate of 3 mg/kg/day, 5 days per week for 24 months, and control group received the vehicle phosphate-buffered saline.

> ...

> The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the pathobiologic effects of long-term, high dose nicotine treatment of A/J mice susceptible to tobacco product-induced lung carcinogenesis.

These were mice genetically engineered for increased cancer susceptibility and also given insane dosages. This study is designed to answer whether nicotine is not carcinogenic. That is, if the result was negative then it would suggest any future study would be wasted effort. A positive result doesn't say anything about the safety of nicotine, per se; just that there remains the possibility it may be carcinogenic. That's very different as many absolutely benign substances could also produce this result.