> The fact that a random stranger is able to push a change and get it reviewed, approved, merged, and available in minutes should be the goal of most open source projects
> On the contrary, older projects tend to be too reactionary when it comes to infrastructure tools, so in turn they get very slow interactions
Well said.
'Open source' doesn't say anything about infrastructure. But it's just as important.
> The fact that a random stranger is able to push a change and get it reviewed, approved, merged, and available in minutes should be the goal of most open source projects.
That sounds like a security risk to me.
Re:Winding down my Debian involvement
by pawelmurias on Monday March 11, 2019 @06:45AM
(#19357948)
How much safer is it if pushing in a malicious change takes two months?
It is not a coincidence that the author became demotivated after doing some professional experience.