News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by cromwellian on Sunday March 10, 2019 @08:26AM (#19351667)
Even if the issue were valid, the analogy itself is absurd. He could have said that Google Search surfaces links from Maps, YouTube, Groups, etc and doesn't penalize them using identical criteria (I don't know if it does or not). But saying Search doesn't penalize Google Search leads to infinite regress, or contradiction: If SERP generates a Link to a Next 10 results page, it must then derank the next page and filter it, but then since it wouldn't generate an internal link, it should rank in the results and be granted pagination. It's like Godelian Incompleteness Statement for Search.

More then that, the entire argument relies on a technicality: Links as UI buttons. Pagination uses links for UI interaction, but after Web 2.0 arrived, it doesn't have to. Infinite scrollers, pure JS pagination + XHR that doesn't generate links could be used.

(yes, I am a Googler, I am most definitely not trying to hide it, it's in my HN profile, I just got tired of constantly typing it, but if you search back far enough before 2010 when I joined, you'll find my opinion on these matters has not changed. I'm a copyright minimalist, I favor decentralized, mostly unregulated web, where everyone can scrape everything, remix, reuse, and repurpose data for permissionless innovation, and I do not favor the government getting involved so it can artificially create categories like 'vertical search' or decide what search algorithms should do)

Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by tzs on Sunday March 10, 2019 @01:56PM (#19353194)
I'd say in general that there is no need to list your employer in your comments or to have it in you profile, but if a comment branch specifically is about that employer then there should be a disclosure in your highest comment on that branch.
Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by mercer on Sunday March 10, 2019 @12:21PM (#19352595)
> yes, I am a Googler, I am most definitely not trying to hide it, it's in my HN profile, I just got tired of constantly typing it

While I don't personally care too much, I suppose it could be problematic if you remove this information from your profile at a later date, and from that point on people reading your comments wouldn't (easily) be able to know that you work at Google.

Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by Filligree on Sunday March 10, 2019 @12:52PM (#19352800)
Google is a big company, and most of us working for them are mainly in it for the paycheck.

Knowing that I work for Google doesn't, by itself, tell you very much about my opinions. It indicates I'm not strongly anti-Google, I guess.

Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by koolba on Sunday March 10, 2019 @01:08PM (#19352910)
> It indicates I'm not strongly anti-Google, I guess.

Or maybe you’re so strongly anti-Google that you realize the only way to take them down is from the inside.

Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by Filligree on Monday March 11, 2019 @09:51PM (#19364659)
And now you know too much.
Re:The Case Against Google (2018) by 908087 on Sunday March 10, 2019 @12:52PM (#19352810)
Out of curiosity, how do you square your belief in a decentralized web with working for a company that has plagued us with "innovations" like amp?