Re:YC's latest moonshot bet is a startup building a $380K “f...
by comicjk on Friday March 08, 2019 @09:39AM
(#19337806)
Commercial airplanes are much safer than cars (because they're rigorously maintained, observed, and operated by professionals). Little ultralight planes might be the best analogy for this project - but they're used by thrill-seekers, just like you predicted.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:YC's latest moonshot bet is a startup building a $380K “f...
by deanclatworthy on Friday March 08, 2019 @03:10PM
(#19341698)
Commercial airplanes are usually able to safely glide under engine failures. A jetpack is going to drop out the sky. Just from glancing at this flying bike, if the power cuts above 10m, you're probably going to die.
Re:YC's latest moonshot bet is a startup building a $380K “f...
by dmayman on Friday March 08, 2019 @08:14PM
(#19343820)
Fixed wing can glide, helicopters can autorotate, open rotor e-vtols don’t autorotate because they don’t have variable pitch blades and their inertia is way too low anyway. jet-vtols have no rotor blades at all so... you’re right if an e-vtol or jet-vtol experiences a catastrophic failure then it’s going straight down! Many of the e-vtol companies say they solve this by having x levels of redundancy..we don’t buy that at JPA. We want to build a saftey system that can rescue the pilot from 5 feet or 50 feet or 5000 feet. Now that’s a challenge! But we believe doable.