or, if you use a service that lets you generate aliases, like gmail's "+", or a service like mailinator.
The problem is that the attack vector of email addresses is they are sometimes used as a username, and therefore contains more information than what is strictly required (for the purpose of a username). Leaking the "real" email address not only leads to spam, but allows a more dedicated attacker to use that email address as a starting point on a different site, or hack the email address altogether.
And with sites increasingly blocking disposable email addresses like mailinator, or disallowing email aliases, the problem can only get worse.
I can confirm the source of every email breach that contains one of my addresses.
p0wn3r $cat testerm
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
p0wn3r $cat testerm | sed 's/+.*@/@/'
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]Does Gmail allow sending from the + addresses? There's quite an issue if somebody contacts you on that address but you reply without the alias.
Can you explain this claim?
If you generate your single-use email addresses wisely, then you should know that the one you gave to - say - Marriott should only ever receive emails from Marriott.
If - say - Marriott gets hacked and that particular one of your many different email addresses leaks, then:
a) you'll find out that address is burned just as soon as anyone other than Marriott uses it (you immediately generate a new one, give it to Marriott, and stop accepting any mail at all on the old one)
and
b) if anyone other than Marriott uses it, you know immediately that that message can't be legit.
ADD: and of course, you aren't really going to stick +BankCo after your real name to generate an email to use with BankCo. You're going to give them something generated like you'd generate a password - "[email protected]" or similar - so if anyone finds out that particular email address for you it doesn't tell them with whom you use it.
Though if you run a full domain you can use emails as one-use affairs. Most don't though and, really, what's the point? It only saves you from journalists, not from a motivated attacker.