Re:Can fake names create bias in interviewing?
by manfredo on Thursday March 07, 2019 @06:11PM
(#19333592)
The distinction between quotas and "outcome based goals" is kind of hazy. To be clear, recruiters aren't required to hit certain targets. Leadership does tell recruiters that they're aiming for a a certain targets but as far as I know recruiters don't receive any penalty if they fall below that target.
Re:Can fake names create bias in interviewing?
by CyberDildonics on Thursday March 07, 2019 @07:24PM
(#19334027)
Even telling recruiters to hire a certain demographic is discrimination. The parent post said that recruiters had large bonuses for certain demographics.
Re:Can fake names create bias in interviewing?
by manfredo on Thursday March 07, 2019 @08:14PM
(#19334292)
I am the root commenter. Bonuses are given regardless of the candidates' divery status, it's just that diverse candidate get a slightly higher bonus. The difference between the bonus of a non-diverse and diverse candidate is about 20%. That difference is not constant because bonuses vary based on other things like the role being hired and the amount of experience. Experienced hires have a bigger bonus than new grads - this is to counteract a past tendency to hire younger employees which led to a skewed age and experience distribution. We also have bigger bonuses to hire managers because we have a chronic shortage of them.
Yes it is.
> Many colleges have race and gender based quota systems.
Quota systems have been repeatedly struck down in college admissions as illegal.
> Governments have race and gender quota systems.
Quota systems for public education (including higher education) and employment have also repeatedly been ruled illegal.