Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under...
by MRD85 on Monday March 04, 2019 @05:39PM
(#19306367)
I understand how that works but we're going to need to draw a line somewhere. Going by job, rank, and salary alone could ignore hours worked per week (statistically men tend to do more in the same role), bonuses for high quality work (who knows how this plays out?), etc. I could choose whatever filters I want to frame the data how I want it to, it's one of the biggest tricks of the "women are paid X less than men" camp.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under...
by slg on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:09PM
(#19306584)
You asked a direct question and I gave you an answer why that question isn't the right one to ask. You are now shifting the debate to be about something completely different.
As I have said in other comments in this thread, there is simply not enough information in this article to say definitely whether there is any gender discrimination in pay at Google and if there is, what gender benefits from that discrimination. Too many people in these comments are approaching this article with biases of their own (on both sides).