News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by jurassic on Monday March 04, 2019 @05:27PM (#19306248)
> areas with primarily male coworkers, and creepy bosses

This describes basically every tech job I have ever had. Real life engineering woman here reporting in.

In 2014 I joined a series B startup as engineer #15 and was the only woman in the office other than the admin; food delivery dudes often brought things to my desk, assuming I must be the office mother. When I was late to work one day after being groped by a strange man on Caltrain, my supervisor questioned my commitment to meeting deadlines. When I moved on, they returned to being a 100% straight white male company.

In 2015, I was the first female engineering hire at the new office of a growing mid-size tech company. A second woman wasn't hired until we'd reached a headcount of about 20. Men, especially clients, often forgot my name. E.g. Janice vs Janet vs Jan (none of these my real name, but you get the idea. The point is that I wasn't important enough to these men to remember.)

Fast forward a few years. Now I am by far the most senior of four engineering ladies at the satellite campus of a household name tech company. Total headcount at this office is about 100 engineers.

I have never had a female manager.

For those keeping score, I have never worked anywhere with more than 5-10% female engineers. For my entire career, even as a noob, I have been the most senior female engineer I know.

I count myself lucky because I've never had to deal with anything resembling actual harassment. (It helps that I am not conventionally attractive). But there is a psychological burden of always feeling alone, always being the first or only, worrying that your actions will be taken to represent all people of your kind, and wondering if assholes in your midst think you've only got where you've gotten because you're a woman.

Your dismissive attitude toward women's supposed advantages is as common as it is damaging. Whatever unfair advantages you think your women colleagues have, unless you are black or latinx, it is unlikely you will ever experience the feelings of isolation and otherness that most women deal with throughout their tech careers.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by HeroOfAges on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:27PM (#19306699)
> Men, especially clients, often forgot my name. E.g. Janice vs Janet vs Jan (none of these my real name, but you get the idea. The point is that I wasn't important enough to these men to remember.)

Are you aware this kind of thing happens to everyone? Do you expect people to remember your name just because you're a woman? Or would you rather they remembered your name because you've accomplished something beyond the ordinary? I'm a black male, by the way.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by jurassic on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:50PM (#19306865)
I’m not talking about one-off meetings where the name doesn’t stick. That happens to everyone, of course. I’m talking about working on projects with the same group of people over a period of months. I have not seen the Matts and Ryans of the world have this problem.
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by llama052 on Monday March 04, 2019 @09:02PM (#19307503)
I don't think there is anyway to know if that's because you're female or not. It could be personality, politics, among many different factors. I think it's unfair to assume that people don't remember your name because you're a female.

I've worked with people for almost a year without remembering their name, because I'm awful with names. They were also very quiet and introverted, rarely said much and I suspect that had something to do it.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by roguecoder on Monday March 04, 2019 @09:40PM (#19307670)
Hey, so I'm sure you didn't mean it this way, but this comment sounds like gaslighting: a woman told you about her experience, and you immediately disbelieved her and told her she is not only incorrect about her experience but that it must be her fault for being "quiet and introverted"?

I recommend starting out by assuming she has knowledge and experiences you don't have access to and learning from it, rather than trying to explain away this new information.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by xenihn on Monday March 04, 2019 @11:43PM (#19308174)
I really don't appreciate you misusing the term since I've had to deal with actual gaslighting in real life. You cannot be gaslit by some random stranger making a single post on the internet. This isn't an obsessed stalker that we're talking about here, it's just a one-off comment that will probably be glanced over and then never thought of again, if it's ever read at all.

Gaslighting is something that happens over a long period of time, with someone you know well and that you trust. The person you are defending is not going to be questioning their sanity or who they are as a person because of one HN post.

Asking someone to reconsider why they were treated a certain way by other people is not gaslighting. Calling someone a liar is not gaslighting. Countering someone's anecdotal evidence with your own is not gaslighting. Please stop trivializing the term, because it's a serious form of emotional and mental abuse, and you're downplaying its severity by tossing the word around like this.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by llama052 on Monday March 04, 2019 @10:15PM (#19307817)
I'm not trying to gaslight or explain anything away. I'm saying there is a multitude of factors as to why you'd be at work and someone wouldn't remember your name.

I'm not blaming anyone, just trying to share another perspective. I personally think it's dangerous to think in black and white. I try to remain a healthy skeptic, and I'm welcome to new perspectives.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by sethammons on Tuesday March 05, 2019 @10:51AM (#19311291)
I've been called Sean more times than I can count and by people I've been acquainted with for a long time, including higher ups. I can't imagine "Seth" is _that_ rare.
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by sizzle on Monday March 04, 2019 @09:47PM (#19307696)
Correlation =/ causation

You could be experiencing this phenomenon for a handful of reasons, none of which being the reason you stated.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by hhjinks on Tuesday March 05, 2019 @07:57AM (#19310191)
Tough shit. Some people just don't manage to attach names to faces, and it sucks way more for us than for you.
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by solidsnack9000 on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:19PM (#19306656)
Whatever unfair advantages you think your women colleagues have, unless you are black or latinx, it is unlikely you will ever experience the feelings of isolation and otherness that most women deal with throughout their tech careers.

Are these two things mutually exclusive? Women could both have the advantages outlined by OP and feel more isolated.

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by pas on Tuesday March 05, 2019 @03:02AM (#19308961)
It's even likely! There are still relatively few women in tech, but they are at the same time pushed, expected to do well (to show they are not just the token gals), and are helped to be there. This is a pretty stressful position to be in.
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by Aeol on Monday March 04, 2019 @10:34PM (#19307896)
You should check out "women who code"
Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by djsumdog on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:15PM (#19306633)
I'm sorry you've had shitty experiences. No on deserves that.

Honestly I'm terrible at names and people only remember mine because it's ethnic. I wouldn't read too much in clients not remembering your name correctly. Humans are generally just bad at names and it might not have anything to do with their perception of you.

I have to ask though, why do you think you were often one of the few/only women/woman at these shops. Did they actively try to recruit women? Did you see women get interviewed but who just didn't make the cut? The last time I was at a shop where they made me go through resumes, I rarely even saw women in the application stack.

I worked with an amazingly talented woman who started back in the day at RealMedia writing C++ codecs. She told me about several cases of harassment or even things like asking her to wear a certain dress a manager liked when she was at trade shows/booths.

I also worked with an English woman at the same company several years my senior, who's been both a developer and product manager, and who says she hasn't experienced that type of harassment while in the tech sector.

I hate anecdotal stuff like this though, because it just doesn't build a big enough picture, which is why actual studies are insightful.

But going back to my question: do you think these shops were actively discriminating against women, passively (subconsciously) discriminating or there simply weren't enough women applicants (they do tend to get sucked up by the big players like Google/Facebook/etc.)

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by movedx on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:15PM (#19306626)
I'm honestly quite taken aback by this.

I want to say sorry, and I will, but I know it's not personally my fault and I know it won't make much of a difference to your circumstances now or in the future. But still, I'm sorry you've had this experience.

I have to be honest and say this, but I think what you've experienced is very much an American culture kind-of-thing. Every time I read a comment like this, besides making me sad and angry, it tends to always come from somewhere in America.

I'm sure something similar has happened and continues to happen here in Australia, but I've seen little of it. That being said, as I sit here now in a very large, well known company, my line of sight gives me a head count of about 30 men and 2 women. This makes me sad and angry, too.

I don't know what to do about this besides encouraging women to come into the industry and protecting them in a none condescending, white-knight, women-are-weak sort of way...

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by devtul on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:27PM (#19306701)
> tends to always come from somewhere in America

In a Chinese forum about knitting nonetheless