Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Underpaying Many Men

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by CryoLogic on Monday March 04, 2019 @04:01PM (#19305420)

It's not being down-voted because it's not a valid discussion point, but instead probably just because HN has a very liberal audience.

Even the most educated are still capable of bias, and many here do not like the opinion that it is possible that women differ from men in any significant ways.

Don't take the down-votes too personally. As long as you are posting constructive feedback with some evidence to your hypothesizes they will be appreciated by many even if the vote count doesn't make it appear to be so.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by esarbe on Monday March 04, 2019 @04:28PM (#19305723)

I don't take the downvotes personally (it's not my post, after all) but it makes me rather curious.

I think it strange that a liberal audience would dispute the fact that there are differences between men and women, even significant differences.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by DenisM on Monday March 04, 2019 @06:27PM (#19306696)

You're mistaking noise for signal. Even the most innocent comments get down-voted in a random drive-by on occasion; they usually recover.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Google Moves to Address Wage Equity, and Finds It’s Under... by Izkata on Monday March 04, 2019 @09:55PM (#19307731)

Prepare for the hardest facepalm you've probably ever experienced: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10fDRERJh4w

[ Parent | on HN ]