News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Launch HN: Searchlight (YC W19) – Hiring based on past pe... by tathougies on Thursday February 28, 2019 @02:45PM (#19274409)
> This made us think - why are we ignoring the the perspectives of people who actually know what it's like to work with a candidate?

Because saying negative things about a past employee can cause you to become liable for libel or slander.

Re:Launch HN: Searchlight (YC W19) – Hiring based on past pe... by annawangx on Thursday February 28, 2019 @02:58PM (#19274523)
The legal aspect is another interesting part of this problem. We have reviewed the legal statutes by state and our terms and conditions make sure our references comply with the law. We require that our references give their feedback without malice and to the best of their knowledge.
Re:Launch HN: Searchlight (YC W19) – Hiring based on past pe... by jedberg on Thursday February 28, 2019 @03:13PM (#19274656)
That won't stop a former employee from suing me though. I might win the case, but I'd still have to pay a fortune to defend myself.
Re:Launch HN: Searchlight (YC W19) – Hiring based on past pe... by tathougies on Thursday February 28, 2019 @05:00PM (#19275683)
Yeah, my business law professor told the entire class to just never give references period. There is no gain, and everything to lose.

Even saying positive things like 'Employee X was fantastic; she was really good at Y' can be grounds for libel. The employee will claim standing based on the fact that, by saying she was good at 'Y' and not 'Z' (which is what the employer really wanted), it was libel by omission.

Re:Launch HN: Searchlight (YC W19) – Hiring based on past pe... by annawangx on Thursday February 28, 2019 @04:24PM (#19275362)
This is a good point about reference checks in general.