Re:Surveillance firm asks Mozilla to be included in Firefox'...
by ncmncm on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @02:09PM
(#19257337)
Yes, they should be troubled by whether they should even bother to explain why they have rejected it, and removed the QuoVadis authorities.
Agonizing over whether to let them in suggests they have let in other questionable entities. "Fairness" is a smokescreen. Nobody honest needs a certificate from a dodgy authority, and nobody with a certificate from a dodgy authority deserves benefit of doubt.
Agonizing over whether to let them in suggests they have let in other questionable entities. "Fairness" is a smokescreen. Nobody honest needs a certificate from a dodgy authority, and nobody with a certificate from a dodgy authority deserves benefit of doubt.