I only skimmed, but...there weren't a bunch of supporting arguments in this piece, right? The argument is basically "people in cages is bad", which seems like a reasonable take if you never question why people are in there.

Anger doesn't "mark...our reaction to encountering a wrong" if our reaction is not grounded in truth.

There is plenty of room for criminal justice reform, but not by banning prisons, and not by this kind of argumentation.