Re:Widespread and sometimes drastic marine oxygen declines
by yesenadam on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:51AM
(#19253108)
>Not non-religious, but other religions
Not sure what you mean by that - you seem to be not very politely saying I got the stat wrong? I was referring to the line:
"No Religion affiliation (16%): atheists, agnostics and people who do not identify with any particular religion."
- which I think it's fair to summarize as "non-religious". (And 15.5% are catholic apparently)
edit: ..Although when I was at my most religious, 25 years ago, I didn't 'identify with any particular religion' but felt very close to a number of different ones - Hindu gurus, christian mystics, buddhism of various types, sufis etc.
Not sure what you mean by that - you seem to be not very politely saying I got the stat wrong? I was referring to the line:
"No Religion affiliation (16%): atheists, agnostics and people who do not identify with any particular religion."
- which I think it's fair to summarize as "non-religious". (And 15.5% are catholic apparently)
edit: ..Although when I was at my most religious, 25 years ago, I didn't 'identify with any particular religion' but felt very close to a number of different ones - Hindu gurus, christian mystics, buddhism of various types, sufis etc.