News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Battle for the Future of Stonehenge.

Re:The Battle for the Future of Stonehenge by mirimir on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @04:02AM (#19252935)
I wonder how long Carhenge will last?[0] Probably not very long, I guess. Rust.

0) http://carhenge.com/wp-content/gallery/carhenge-1/FOC_bw-pic...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Battle for the Future of Stonehenge by alex_young on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @07:27AM (#19253689)
Concretehenge should last I think: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maryhill_Stonehenge
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Battle for the Future of Stonehenge by dev_north_east on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @08:03AM (#19253884)
What about Achill-henge? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achill-henge

:D

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Battle for the Future of Stonehenge by mirimir on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @02:19PM (#19257428)
That went up in one weekend! Using stock concrete slabs, I guess. Maybe the sort they use for bridges, given their size and shape.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Battle for the Future of Stonehenge by mirimir on Tuesday February 26, 2019 @02:12PM (#19257371)
It's cool to see a full-sized replica, arguably looking ~like the original did. I wonder what the weather's like in Maryhill. If there's not too much freeze-thaw, it might well last thousands of years. I mean, some Roman concrete has.
[ Parent | on HN ]