Re:SEC Asks Manhattan Federal Court to Hold Elon Musk in Con...
by cat199 on Monday February 25, 2019 @07:36PM
(#19250968)
as stupid as tweeting incorrectly and without legal review when tweeting correctly and with review is essentially your simple, easy to observe, 'terms of parole'?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SEC Asks Manhattan Federal Court to Hold Elon Musk in Con...
by eduah on Monday February 25, 2019 @07:52PM
(#19251083)
Actual government legal agency going after someone on a stupid immaterial technicality about requiring approval for disclosing material information that might affect stock:
The tweet didn't have material information. The 500k number was public and discussed on a public investor call.
vs.
Crazy guy that bankrupted himself trying to build a rocket company and a car company simultaneously is less than overly cautious about his tweeting and how it could be used in bad faith by a government legal agency in the USA to persecute him.
Re:SEC Asks Manhattan Federal Court to Hold Elon Musk in Con...
by jacques_chester on Monday February 25, 2019 @08:18PM
(#19251213)
He publicly bragged. That's not "less than overly cautious" behaviour. That's flat out arrogance.