Re:Is it still ok to have kids in face of climate change?
by NLips on Monday February 25, 2019 @11:58AM
(#19247028)
The question is phrased ambiguously, but the article makes it clearer that what is meant is:
"Is it still OK _for the planet_ to have kids...", not "Is it still OK _for the kids_ to have kids..."
EDIT: actually, I'm not sure which one of those the representative was getting at.
Re:Is it still ok to have kids in face of climate change?
by rand0mbits on Monday February 25, 2019 @01:15PM
(#19247894)
"Is it still OK _for the planet_ to have kids..."
That's a strange question. The planet doesn't have feelings, so it doesn't really care whether or not we have kids.
Other living organisms on the planet may care. But the rock we're on surely doesn't.
Re:Is it still ok to have kids in face of climate change?
by natalyarostova on Monday February 25, 2019 @11:59AM
(#19247038)
Thanks for clarifying.
Re:Is it still ok to have kids in face of climate change?
by enraged_camel on Monday February 25, 2019 @12:00PM
(#19247060)
>> I would say the expected cost of climate change to the lives of children born today is still far far less then the expected cost in the past due to disease, war, famine (etc).
This is exactly why it misses the point. Having kids is a significant contributor to carbon emissions, and therefore climate change.
Re:Is it still ok to have kids in face of climate change?
by umvi on Monday February 25, 2019 @12:05PM
(#19247130)
More significant than cows? I would rather cut back on meat and dairy consumption than be forbidden from raising children.
Re:Is it still ok to have kids in face of climate change?
by natalyarostova on Monday February 25, 2019 @12:56PM
(#19247679)
I guess it depends if your kid is a vegetarian then :^)
So the poster above is noting that if people were, or we would have, been okay with having kids in the past, then we still should today.